#1
Posted 23 June 2011 - 09:23 PM
Since my head had been taken off for some work. I would like to know what gasket should I use?
What are the pro and cons of running a thicker headgasket (apart from running more boost)?
I have bought ACL 1.6mm Copper and Cometic and OEM 1.3mm MLS
Cheers.
#2
Posted 24 June 2011 - 09:12 AM
the old school thought was that copper gaskets needed fire rings machined into top of block. i presume this is still the case.
the mls should have a different machine finish to the block and head (finer finish i think?) for maximum reliability.
ON THE ENGINE STAND. g4cs 2.4l long motor from >1992 sonata. YES. gt35r coming soon.
thanks for parts and help: BMGTZ, EVOCPE, cwolf, Benozi, Jamo-GSR, 1JUM2NV, RXVII...... much appreciated, cheers guys.
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. —Enzo Ferrari
REMEMBER: you cant polish a turd, but you can roll it in glitter.
#3
Posted 24 June 2011 - 09:26 AM
#4
Posted 26 June 2011 - 12:17 AM
E1 - 2.2 400kw atw 25psi
#5
Posted 26 June 2011 - 01:19 PM
thats about it...
cons- decompresses motor
reduces squish band
creates localised heat
copper, o ringing, and thick head gaskets are all dinosaur technologys... mls is by far the better choice
#6
Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:28 PM
Basically higher cr = more off boost power and less boost potential. Lower cr = less off boost power but more boost potential. The rules change on high octane fuel though.
AMG | 14.1 @ 116mph 2.80 60ft - 280 fw kw - Springy Motors Dyno - BP98
GVR4 | 11.08 @ 132mph 1.80 60ft - 330 aw kw - Springy Motors Dyno - BP98
GVR4 | 10.93 @ 135mph 1.98 60ft - 360 aw kw - Spring Motors Dyno - BP98
Springy Motors | BJP | Autronic | Motec | Knox Mitsubishi | X3E | Galantvr4.org | 4Gtuner.com | Ebay
#7
Posted 27 June 2011 - 10:39 AM
I now run a thinner than stock gasket but with a lower CR than I had when I ran the 1.3mm gasket.
And from my limited experience with copper gaskets I wouldt even consider them at all.
all fabrication BJP AUTOMOTIVE
winton 1:29.8 /// sandown 1:21.5 /// phillip island 1:49.2 /// haunted hills 59.1 /// eastern creek 1:37.6
#8
Posted 27 June 2011 - 08:10 PM
Cheers.
Edited by slowvac, 27 June 2011 - 08:11 PM.
#9
Posted 28 June 2011 - 09:57 AM
ON THE ENGINE STAND. g4cs 2.4l long motor from >1992 sonata. YES. gt35r coming soon.
thanks for parts and help: BMGTZ, EVOCPE, cwolf, Benozi, Jamo-GSR, 1JUM2NV, RXVII...... much appreciated, cheers guys.
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. —Enzo Ferrari
REMEMBER: you cant polish a turd, but you can roll it in glitter.
#10
Posted 28 September 2011 - 08:33 PM
It had been a busy time. My friend did not have a chance to get the head flowed (But he was satisfied that the head will perform well). I took my head to a machinest and they told me that I could not use the factory MLS gasket as the combustion chamber was slightly to much (just past the sealing ring). The only way is to use a copper gasket and grind the combustion chamber to fit. Now the head has been bolted up on the car and in a couple of weeks the car will be back on the road.
Cheers.
Edited by slowvac, 28 September 2011 - 08:34 PM.
#11
Posted 28 September 2011 - 09:13 PM
Slightly too much? As in cr too high? Or Pistons wont clear the head at tdc?
Or bore too big?
I dont see the reason why you need a copper gasket. You can get mls gasket up to 1.9mm from the last time I was looking which is considered thick. Tomei were the ones doing it. If big bore is required, Cometic do them +80 thou last time I checked. If the Pistons protrude too much, get custom Pistons to suit your desired cr.
AMG | 14.1 @ 116mph 2.80 60ft - 280 fw kw - Springy Motors Dyno - BP98
GVR4 | 11.08 @ 132mph 1.80 60ft - 330 aw kw - Springy Motors Dyno - BP98
GVR4 | 10.93 @ 135mph 1.98 60ft - 360 aw kw - Spring Motors Dyno - BP98
Springy Motors | BJP | Autronic | Motec | Knox Mitsubishi | X3E | Galantvr4.org | 4Gtuner.com | Ebay
#12
Posted 29 September 2011 - 08:18 PM
The bores size are still factory spec (haven't touched the bottom end). My friend got a bit to excited when cleaning the combustion chamber on the head with the grinder. What happen is when placing the OEM gasket over the head the gasket would not have sealed properly. The only solution is to either run a big bore gasket/custom MLS or copper(which is one peice and can be modified to fit and won't effect the gasket integerity (from what I was told)). Only time would tell.
Once I get my car back on the road. I'll pop over and show the pictures and show what I'm talking about.
Once this was all the inital head issues I had. I already ordered a performance head and cam combo from the US for a replacement but now is spare for the future project (very expensive coffee table/stool at the moment, but it would have been interesting to see how it performed with the stock bottom end).
Cheers.
#13
Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:49 AM
E1 - 2.2 400kw atw 25psi
#14
Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:50 AM
#15
Posted 07 October 2011 - 11:04 AM
So far the modified head made a big differences with the car.
Cheers.
#16
Posted 31 December 2011 - 02:13 PM
The copper gasket would have been good but unfortunately it did not work in my situation..
Cheers
#17
Posted 01 January 2012 - 11:19 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





Back to top
View Garage









